Skip to content
News & Resources

Data

Assumed Rate of Return for State and Local Pensions 2026

Last Updated:

Author/s: Anthony Randazzo

Source: Equable Original

    Tags:

  • Investment Policy
Fingers holding a single white puzzle piece

The average assumed rate of return for state pension plans in the United States is 6.88%, as of June 2026. The median is 7.0%.

Equable Institute tracks financial reporting for 264 defined benefit plans — e.g. pensions, guaranteed return, and hybrid plans — which are governed by 202 public sector retirement systems. Analyses are limited to 253 of those plans due to incomplete reporting and data availability issues. Of the plans included in analyses, most are state-administered, but our data also include information for 78 of the largest municipally sponsored defined benefit plans in places like New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, Houston, Orange County, Miami, and more.

Equable Insight

All data as of June 2026.

  • Average ARR: 6.88%
  • Median ARR: 7.0%
  • Average 2025 Return: 10.4%

What is Assumed Rate of Return?

The assumed rate of return is an educated guess about how much a pension can reasonably expect to earn in the long term by investing contributions made to the plan.

A plan’s ARR is calculated by actuaries, who are financial professionals that measure risk and other factors in order to estimate how much a retirement system must bring in from contributions and pay out in the form of benefits each year. 

Why is Assumed Rate of Return Important?

Assumed rate of return is the single most important assumption that pension systems make within the overall pension funding formula. Once it’s set by the pension board, the ARR allows actuaries to determine the level of annual contributions that are necessary to pay in advance for all of the benefits earned in that year.

The higher the assumed rate of return, the fewer contributions teachers and employers have to make. The lower the assumed rate of return, the higher contributions need to be in order to pay for the benefits promised.

In short, ARR is important because it ensures pension systems have enough funding to pay their promised benefits.

Assumed Rates of Return by State

The graphic below details the median assumed rate of return for each state, as of June 2026, using data from those state and local retirement plans.

Assumed Rates of Return by Retirement System

The following table provides a list of plans and their current assumed return in both 2006 and 2026. Scroll through the table to find figures for your plan and see how ARRs have changed over the past two decades.

Current Assumed Rates of Return by Plan 2006 & 2026

Active investment assumptions used by U.S. state and local retirement plans

State▲▼ Plan▲▼ 2006 Assumed Rate▲▼ 2026 Assumed Rate▲▼
Illinois Chicago Transit 9.00% 7.75%
Arkansas Arkansas DOT 8.00% 7.50%
Iowa Iowa MFPRS 7.50% 7.50%
Maryland Montgomery County Maryland ERS 8.00% 7.50%
Ohio Ohio PFPF 8.25% 7.50%
Ohio Cincinatti ERS 8.00% 7.50%
Oklahoma Oklahoma LERS N/A 7.50%
Oklahoma Oklahoma PPRS 7.50% 7.50%
Oklahoma Oklahoma FRS 7.50% 7.50%
Texas Texas CDRS 8.00% 7.50%
Alabama Alabama ERS 8.00% 7.45%
Alabama Alabama TRS 8.00% 7.45%
Missouri Missouri PEERS 8.00% 7.30%
Missouri Missouri PSRS 8.00% 7.30%
Montana Montana PERS 8.00% 7.30%
Montana Montana TRS 7.75% 7.30%
Pennsylvania Philadelphia Municipal 8.75% 7.30%
Texas Austin FRS 7.75% 7.30%
Alaska Alaska PERS 8.25% 7.25%
Alaska Alaska TRS 8.25% 7.25%
Arkansas Arkansas TRS 8.00% 7.25%
Arkansas Arkansas Local P&F 8.00% 7.25%
California San Bernardino ERA 8.00% 7.25%
Colorado Colorado Schools 8.50% 7.25%
Colorado Colorado DPS 8.50% 7.25%
Colorado Colorado State 8.50% 7.25%
Colorado Colorado Local 8.50% 7.25%
Colorado Colorado Judges 8.50% 7.25%
Illinois Illinois MRF 7.50% 7.25%
Kansas Wichita WERS 7.75% 7.25%
Kansas Wichita P&F 7.75% 7.25%
Louisiana Louisiana LASERS 8.25% 7.25%
Louisiana Louisiana TRS 8.25% 7.25%
Missouri Kansas City Missouri Schools 8.00% 7.25%
Missouri St. Louis Employees 8.00% 7.25%
Nevada Nevada PERS-R 8.00% 7.25%
Nevada Nevada PERS-PF 8.00% 7.25%
New Mexico New Mexico PERA 8.00% 7.25%
Ohio Ohio HRS 8.00% 7.25%
Texas Austin Police 8.00% 7.25%
Texas Dallas ERS 8.25% 7.25%
Texas San Antonio P&F 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington LEOFF Plan 1 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington LEOFF Plan 2 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington PERS 1 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington PERS 2/3 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington PSERS 2 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington SERS 2/3 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington SPRS 1/2 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington TRS 1 8.00% 7.25%
Washington Washington TRS 2/3 8.00% 7.25%
West Virginia West Virginia PERS 7.50% 7.25%
West Virginia West Virginia TRS 7.50% 7.25%
Arizona Arizona CORP 8.50% 7.20%
Arizona Arizona EORP 8.50% 7.20%
Arizona Arizona PSPRS 8.50% 7.20%
California San Francisco City & County 8.00% 7.20%
North Dakota North Dakota TFR 8.00% 7.15%
Kentucky Kentucky TRS 7.50% 7.10%
Nebraska Lincoln P&F 7.50% 7.10%
Arizona Arizona CORP Tier 3 N/A 7.00%
Arizona Arizona PSPRS Tier 3 N/A 7.00%
Arizona Arizona SRS 8.00% 7.00%
Arizona Phoenix ERS 8.00% 7.00%
Arkansas Arkansas PERS 8.00% 7.00%
California CalSTRS 8.00% 7.00%
California LA County ERS 7.75% 7.00%
California Los Angeles ERS 8.00% 7.00%
California Los Angeles Fire and Police 8.00% 7.00%
California Alameda County ERS 8.00% 7.00%
California Kern County ERS 8.00% 7.00%
California Orange County ERS 7.75% 7.00%
Colorado Colorado P&F 8.00% 7.00%
Colorado Denver ERS 8.00% 7.00%
Connecticut Connecticut MERS 8.50% 7.00%
Delaware Delaware SEPP 8.00% 7.00%
Delaware Delaware Muni 8.00% 7.00%
Delaware Delaware Muni P&F 8.00% 7.00%
Florida Miami GESE 8.10% 7.00%
Georgia Georgia ERS 7.50% 7.00%
Georgia Atlanta ERS N/A 7.00%
Georgia Atlanta Police 8.00% 7.00%
Georgia Atlanta Fire 7.75% 7.00%
Hawaii Hawaii ERS 8.00% 7.00%
Illinois Illinois TRS 8.50% 7.00%
Illinois Cook County ERS 7.50% 7.00%
Illinois Chicago Water 7.75% 7.00%
Illinois Chicago Parks 8.00% 7.00%
Iowa Iowa PERS 7.50% 7.00%
Kansas Kansas PERS-S 8.00% 7.00%
Kansas Kansas PERS-T 8.00% 7.00%
Kansas Kansas PERS-L 8.00% 7.00%
Kansas Kansas PF 8.00% 7.00%
Kansas Kansas JRS 8.00% 7.00%
Louisiana Baton Rouge City Parish RS N/A 7.00%
Massachusetts Massachusetts SERS 8.25% 7.00%
Massachusetts Massachusetts TRS 8.25% 7.00%
Massachusetts Boston Teachers 8.25% 7.00%
Minnesota Minnesota SERF 8.50% 7.00%
Minnesota Minnesota SPRS N/A 7.00%
Minnesota Minnesota SCEP N/A 7.00%
Minnesota Minnesota TRA 8.50% 7.00%
Minnesota Minnesota GERF 8.50% 7.00%
Minnesota Minnesota PEPFP 8.50% 7.00%
Minnesota Minnesota LCEP 8.50% 7.00%
Minnesota St. Paul Teachers 8.50% 7.00%
Mississippi Mississippi PERS 8.00% 7.00%
Missouri Missouri LGERS 7.50% 7.00%
Missouri Kansas City Missouri ERS 7.75% 7.00%
Missouri St. Louis School Employees 8.00% 7.00%
Missouri St. Louis Police N/A 7.00%
Missouri Kansas City Missouri Fire 8.00% 7.00%
New Jersey New Jersey PERS-S 8.25% 7.00%
New Jersey New Jersey PERS-L 8.25% 7.00%
New Jersey New Jersey PFRS-S 8.25% 7.00%
New Jersey New Jersey PFRS-L 8.25% 7.00%
New Jersey New Jersey TPAF 8.25% 7.00%
New Jersey New Jersey SPRS 8.25% 7.00%
New Mexico New Mexico ERB 8.00% 7.00%
New York New York City Teachers 8.00% 7.00%
New York New York City ERS 8.00% 7.00%
New York New York City Fire N/A 7.00%
New York New York City Police 8.00% 7.00%
New York New York City BERS 8.00% 7.00%
Ohio Ohio SERS 8.00% 7.00%
Ohio Ohio STRS 8.00% 7.00%
Oklahoma Oklahoma TRS 8.00% 7.00%
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania PSERS 8.50% 7.00%
Rhode Island Rhode Island ERS-S 8.25% 7.00%
Rhode Island Rhode Island ERS-T 8.25% 7.00%
Rhode Island Rhode Island MERS 8.25% 7.00%
Rhode Island Providence ERS 8.50% 7.00%
South Carolina South Carolina PORS 7.25% 7.00%
South Carolina South Carolina RS 7.25% 7.00%
Texas Texas ERS 8.00% 7.00%
Texas Texas LECOS 8.00% 7.00%
Texas Texas TRS 8.00% 7.00%
Texas Houston MEPS 8.50% 7.00%
Texas Houston PFRS 8.50% 7.00%
Texas Houston Police 8.50% 7.00%
Vermont Vermont Muni 8.00% 7.00%
Vermont Vermont SERS 8.00% 7.00%
Vermont Vermont STRS 8.00% 7.00%
Virginia Fairfax County Schools 7.50% 7.00%
Louisiana Louisiana SPRS 7.50% 6.95%
Missouri Missouri SERS 8.50% 6.95%
Nebraska Nebraska SEP 8.00% 6.95%
New York New York STRS 8.00% 6.95%
Michigan Michigan MERS 8.00% 6.93%
Connecticut Connecticut SERS 8.50% 6.90%
Connecticut Connecticut STRS 8.50% 6.90%
Georgia Georgia TRS 7.50% 6.90%
Louisiana Louisiana FRS 7.50% 6.90%
Maryland Baltimore Fire and Police 8.25% 6.90%
Massachusetts Boston Employees N/A 6.90%
Nebraska Nebraska PERS-CB 7.60% 6.90%
Ohio Ohio PERS 8.00% 6.90%
Oregon Oregon PERS 8.00% 6.90%
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania SERS 8.50% 6.88%
Louisiana Louisiana MERS A N/A 6.85%
Louisiana Louisiana MERS B N/A 6.85%
Utah Utah CRS 8.00% 6.85%
Utah Utah CRS-T2 N/A 6.85%
Utah Utah FRS 8.00% 6.85%
Utah Utah NRS 8.00% 6.85%
Utah Utah PSC 8.00% 6.85%
Utah Utah PSC-T2 N/A 6.85%
Utah Utah PSN 8.00% 6.85%
Utah Utah Judges 8.00% 6.85%
California CalPERS 7.75% 6.80%
Louisiana Louisiana SRS 7.50% 6.80%
Maryland Maryland ECS 7.75% 6.80%
Maryland Maryland TCS 7.75% 6.80%
Wisconsin Wisconsin RS 7.80% 6.80%
Wisconsin Milwaukee City ERS 8.50% 6.80%
Wisconsin Milwaukee County ERS 8.00% 6.80%
Wyoming Wyoming RS 8.00% 6.80%
Arizona Tucson Supplemental RS 7.75% 6.75%
California California URS 7.50% 6.75%
California Contra Costa County 7.80% 6.75%
California Sacramento County ERS 7.75% 6.75%
California Marin County ERS 8.00% 6.75%
Connecticut Hartford MERF 8.00% 6.75%
Florida Miami Fire and Police 7.75% 6.75%
Illinois Illinois SERS 8.50% 6.75%
Illinois Chicago Police N/A 6.75%
Illinois Chicago Municipal 8.00% 6.75%
Illinois Chicago Firemen N/A 6.75%
Illinois Chicago Laborers 8.00% 6.75%
Louisiana Louisiana MPERS 7.50% 6.75%
Michigan Detroit General RS 1 N/A 6.75%
Michigan Detroit PFRS 2 7.80% 6.75%
Michigan Detroit General RS 2 7.90% 6.75%
Michigan Detroit PFRS 1 N/A 6.75%
Missouri Kansas City Missouri Civilian Police 7.75% 6.75%
Missouri Kansas City Missouri Police 7.75% 6.75%
New Hampshire New Hampshire RS 8.50% 6.75%
Tennessee Tennessee PERP 7.50% 6.75%
Tennessee Tennessee TLPP 7.50% 6.75%
Tennessee Tennessee TRP N/A 6.75%
Texas Texas MRS 7.00% 6.75%
Texas Austin ERS 7.75% 6.75%
Virginia Virgina JRS 7.50% 6.75%
Virginia Virgina LORS 7.50% 6.75%
Virginia Virginia RS-S 7.50% 6.75%
Virginia Virgina SPORS 7.50% 6.75%
Virginia Virginia RS-T 7.50% 6.75%
Virginia Virginia RS-L 7.50% 6.75%
Virginia Fairfax County ERS 7.50% 6.75%
Washington Seattle ERS 7.75% 6.75%
Florida Florida RS 7.75% 6.70%
California San Jose P&F 8.00% 6.62%
Idaho Idaho PERS 7.75% 6.55%
California Los Angeles Water and Power 8.00% 6.50%
California San Diego City ERS 8.00% 6.50%
California San Diego County 8.25% 6.50%
Florida Jacksonville ERS 8.40% 6.50%
Illinois Illinois SURS 8.50% 6.50%
Illinois Illinois JRS 8.00% 6.50%
Illinois Chicago Teachers 8.00% 6.50%
Kentucky Kentucky CERS NH 7.75% 6.50%
Kentucky Kentucky CERS H 7.75% 6.50%
Maine Maine CPPLD 7.75% 6.50%
Maine Maine SETP 7.75% 6.50%
Missouri Missouri DOT 8.25% 6.50%
North Carolina North Carolina LGERS 7.25% 6.50%
North Carolina North Carolina TSERS 7.25% 6.50%
North Dakota North Dakota PERS 8.00% 6.50%
Oklahoma Oklahoma PERS 7.50% 6.50%
South Dakota South Dakota RS 7.75% 6.50%
Texas Dallas PFRS 8.50% 6.50%
Louisiana Louisiana SPERS A 8.00% 6.40%
Louisiana Louisiana SPERS B 8.00% 6.40%
District of Columbia D.C. POFRP 7.25% 6.25%
District of Columbia D.C. TRP 7.25% 6.25%
Florida Jacksonville P&F 8.50% 6.25%
Indiana Indiana 1977 P&F 7.25% 6.25%
Indiana Indiana PERF 7.25% 6.25%
Indiana Indiana TRF 1996 7.50% 6.25%
Indiana Indiana TRF Pre-96 7.50% 6.25%
Kentucky Kentucky ERS H 7.75% 6.25%
California California JRF II 7.25% 6.00%
Michigan Michigan PSERS 8.00% 6.00%
Michigan Michigan PSERS PPP N/A 6.00%
Michigan Michigan PSERS PPP2 N/A 6.00%
Michigan Michigan SERS 8.00% 6.00%
Michigan Michigan SPRS 8.00% 6.00%
New York New York SLRS ERS 8.00% 5.90%
New York New York SLRS PFRS 8.00% 5.90%
Kentucky Kentucky ERS NH 7.75% 5.25%
Kentucky Kentucky SPRS 7.75% 5.25%
Pennsylvania Pennsylvania MRS 6.00% 5.25%
California California JRF 7.25% 3.00%

Table: Equable • Source: Equable Institute • Click a column header to sort

This table will be updated periodically as state plans announce changes to their assumed return via press release indicating that a board of trustees has voted to make a change or when such a change is reported in a published actuarial valuation report.

Current Landscape: 2026 Public Pension Investment Assumptions

The latest data analyzed in Equable’s State of Pensions 2026 report show public pensions have progressed toward lower investment assumptions over time, particularly since the financial crisis of 2008-09.

Assumed rates of return averaged 8.1% when the Great Recession hit. As of June 2026, that figure sits at 6.88%.

This is generally good news. The unfunded liabilities that have plagued most public retirement systems since the early 2000s are the result of investments underperforming relative to assumptions during economic downturns like the Dot-Com Recession or the Financial Crisis. That is, states, cities, and counties assumed unrealistic returns on their pension assets and, by extension, weren’t contributing enough to pay for promised benefits.

However, even the current average of 6.88% is still overly optimistic for state and local pension funds, as we estimate that the average fund has less than a 50% chance to earn 7% over the next decade.

Distribution of Investment Assumptions in 2026

The figure below shows a long-term comparison between the distribution of assumed rates of return for the top state and local defined benefit plans in 2006 and 2026.

In June 2006, there were 230 major public pension plans with ARRs higher than 7%, including 56 with ARRs above 8%. One plan assumed returns of exactly 7%, and just one other plan had an ARR of 6.5% or less. 

Since then, the distribution of assumptions has shifted significantly. 

As of June 2026, just 60 plans have ARRs higher than 7%. No plans have ARRs of 8% or above. Meanwhile, 84 plans now assume returns of exactly 7%, and 66 plans have ARRs between 6.75% and 6.99%. 

Marking a vast improvement since 2006, 40 plans have assumed returns of 6.5% or less. These plans are leading their peers in adopting more realistic future expectations.

As noted, state and local pension plans have adopted a wider range of assumptions over the past two decades. The figure below shows the highest and lowest assumed rates of return in each year since 2001, as well as the median and average trend over time.

The lowest rate adopted by any plan open to new members is 5.25% (Kentucky State Police, Kentucky Employees Non-Hazardous and Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System). The highest rate currently used for a municipal plan is 7.75% (Chicago Transit Authority) and for a state plan is 7.5%.

As the figure above shows, states and pension boards have been slow to reduce their investment assumptions. 

It took retirement systems more than a decade to move away from unrealistic 8% investment return assumptions. Fortunately, it is taking less time to also move past a similarly optimistic 7.5% assumed rate of return. The new target for public plans to leave behind is a 7% assumed return, which is currently the median assumption. 

Assumed Rate of Return Versus Interest Rates

The chart below shows the average assumed return since 2001 (light blue line) and the historic change in interest rates, as represented by the 10-year and 30-year Treasury yields (yellow and dark blue lines).

The difference between interest rates and the assumed rate of return reflects how much pension funds think they can get by taking risks with their investments beyond just buying perfectly safe U.S. Treasury bonds. 

While the gap between interest rates and assumed rates of return has tightened in recent years, the current spread reflects an ongoing risk that pension funds accept.

Now that Treasury bonds have almost returned to the levels they were in the early 2000s, the current average assumed rate of return of 6.88% is actually lower than the 7.13% (see the dashed orange line) that would have maintained the same risk difference they held back then.

This is a good outcome, but isn't completely indicative of smart management on the part of pension boards, as for the years between 2001 and 2020, Treasury bonds had considerably lower returns than present day. In those years, pension boards kept their assumptions high despite the declining bond yields, because they were taking on more risk with their investments in order to keep their costs down.